Investment diligence for software transactions

Know what you’re
actually buying.

We test how hard a software business is to recreate, so you can underwrite what makes it defensible.

Layers of graphite and aluminium separated to reveal a solid teal core
~2 weeksBuilt for the deal timeline Controlled replicationSenior engineering-led IC-ready conclusionsEvidence for underwriting Fixed scopeOne investment question

Well built isn’t the
same as defensible.

Development history is no longer a reliable proxy for product defensibility. The investment question needs a different test.

Conventional technical diligence

Is this software
well built?

Architecture, code quality, security, scalability, technical debt, and the engineering organization.

The SoftDiligence question

Is this software
difficult to reproduce?

If somebody tried, what would it actually take?

How we test it

SoftDiligence works alongside conventional technical diligence to test the economic defensibility of the product being acquired.

Two matching architectural models, with one opened to expose its teal inner component

We attempt to
reproduce the product.

A controlled build sprint turns assumptions about replicability into evidence about time, talent, cost, and uncertainty.

  1. Start with the target

    Review the demo, architecture, documentation, and the defensibility claims being underwritten.

  2. Run a controlled replication sprint

    A senior engineering team attempts reproduction against a defined scope, measuring effort and identifying barriers.

  3. Find the irreducible advantage

    Separate what can be recreated from the data, integrations, workflow, and distribution that resist replication.

Defensibility is not binary

One product.
Three different barriers.

Reproducing the interface, operating the product, and winning the customer are different challenges. We assess each separately.

Lower barrier

Can the visible product experience be reproduced?

We test the functionality and workflows a customer can see. A convincing demonstration can be much easier to recreate than a production business.

Interface & workflowsCore functionalityDemonstrable replication

A product may take months to reproduce technically, but years to reproduce commercially. Those are different investment conclusions.

Two weeks.
One investment question.

A focused diligence sprint designed around live transactions and minimal management disruption.

  1. Days 1-2

    Frame the moat

    Review the product, architecture, and management’s defensibility claims.

  2. Days 3-8

    Test replication

    Run the controlled build sprint and engineering analysis.

  3. Days 9-10

    Find barriers

    Assess demonstration, production, and commercial parity.

  4. Days 11-12

    Quantify effort

    Estimate time, talent, cost, and uncertainty.

  5. Days 13-14

    Read out

    Deliver IC-ready findings and discuss the investment implications.

Works alongside your deal team

QoE Commercial DD Technical DD Legal & cyber

From engineering to economics

Evidence that changes
the investment decision.

An IC-ready defensibility scorecard connects replication findings to valuation, the downside case, and negotiation.

Illustrative target

ExampleCo

Overall defensibilityModerate
Demonstration parity
3-5 weeks
Production parity
6-12 months
Commercial parity
24+ months
Estimated replication cost
$1.2-2.0m

The investment conclusion

The application layer is substantially more replicable than management positioning implies, but proprietary data and distribution create meaningful commercial defensibility.

ValuationDownside caseIC memoNegotiation

The objective is evidence that changes underwriting. Each engagement distinguishes what the sprint demonstrates from what remains uncertain.

Different capital.
The same software risk.

Is the downside defensible?

How exposed are enterprise value and recovery value to technological commoditization?

Understand which barriers protect the business if the software itself becomes cheaper and faster to recreate.

Before the sprint.

Does this replace conventional technical diligence?

No. Conventional technical diligence examines how well the software is built. SoftDiligence works alongside it to test how difficult the product and business would be to recreate.

What access does an engagement need?

We frame the sprint around the available demo, architecture, documentation, and public information. The engagement scope establishes the access needed to test the investment question.

What does the two-week sprint deliver?

A defensibility scorecard, measured replication findings, estimates of time and cost, and an investor readout. Findings distinguish demonstration, production, and commercial parity.

Does a successful replication mean there is no moat?

No. A replicable application may still have strong proprietary data, integration, workflow, or distribution barriers. We separate those sources of defensibility so the investment conclusion reflects the whole business.

Your next software deal.
Underwrite the difference.

Know what can be recreated.
Know what cannot.

Discuss a deal

Start with the investment question

Discuss your next deal.

Choose a time for a 30-minute conversation about your software transaction and the diligence questions that matter.

Prefer a separate window? Open the booking page